Sudan vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment

Sudan
82.28 %
in 2022
Zimbabwe
79.23 %
in 2023
Sudan rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
32nd

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment over time

  • Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
020406080200020112023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 82.28 % against 79.23 % in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.05 %.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 137 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 86.74 % 86.88 % 0.142 % Zimbabwe
2010s 83.93 % 85.54 % 1.61 % Zimbabwe
2020s 82.44 % 78.47 % 3.97 % Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Sudan, at 82.28 % against 79.23 % in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
3.05 %, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Sudan ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/sudan/zimbabwe/">Sudan vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,347 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.