Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment

Papua New Guinea
57.94 %
in 2023
Serbia
54.53 %
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
55th
Serbia rank
58th

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Serbia
020406080100200020112023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 57.94 % against 54.53 % in Serbia, a difference of 3.41 %.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Serbia ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 55th and Serbia ranks 58th of 137 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 55.94 % 85.38 % 29.44 % Serbia
2010s 55.62 % 56.41 % 0.791 % Serbia
2020s 57.91 % 54.97 % 2.93 % Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment, Papua New Guinea or Serbia?
Papua New Guinea, at 57.94 % against 54.53 % in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment between Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
3.41 %, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Serbia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Serbia rank globally for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Papua New Guinea ranks 55th and Serbia ranks 58th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/papua-new-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/papua-new-guinea/serbia/">Papua New Guinea vs Serbia: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,347 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.