Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Caledonia: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 100 % against 80.3 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 19.7 %.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 2nd and New Caledonia ranks 1st of 31 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.32 % | 100 % | 14.68 % | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 82.1 % | 75.55 % | 6.55 % | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 80.47 % | 79.88 % | 0.6 % | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 100 % against 80.3 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Caledonia?
- 19.7 %, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Caledonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Caledonia rank globally for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 2nd and New Caledonia ranks 1st of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.