Latin America and the Caribbean vs Uganda: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment

Latin America and the Caribbean
28.83 %
in 2023
Uganda
86.53 %
in 2023
Latin America and the Caribbean rank
22nd
Uganda rank
25th

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment over time

  • Latin America and the Caribbean
  • Uganda
20406080100200020112023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 86.53 % against 28.83 % in Latin America and the Caribbean, a difference of 57.7 %.

That makes Uganda's figure about 3.0 times Latin America and the Caribbean's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 22nd and Uganda ranks 25th of 31 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America and the Caribbean Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 33.33 % 91 % 57.67 % Uganda
2010s 29.28 % 87.75 % 58.47 % Uganda
2020s 30.19 % 83.21 % 53.02 % Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment, Latin America and the Caribbean or Uganda?
Uganda, at 86.53 % against 28.83 % in Latin America and the Caribbean as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment between Latin America and the Caribbean and Uganda?
57.7 %, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America and the Caribbean and Uganda?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Latin America and the Caribbean and Uganda rank globally for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 22nd and Uganda ranks 25th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America and the Caribbean vs Uganda: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/latin-america-and-the-caribbean/uganda/">Latin America and the Caribbean vs Uganda: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,347 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.