Belarus vs Eswatini: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment

Belarus
35.03 %
in 2023
Eswatini
35.4 %
in 2023
Belarus rank
81st
Eswatini rank
80th

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment over time

  • Belarus
  • Eswatini
0204060200020112023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 35.4 % against 35.03 % in Belarus, a difference of 0.37 %.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 81st and Eswatini ranks 80th of 137 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 48.12 % 35.3 % 12.82 % Belarus
2010s 38.86 % 32.28 % 6.58 % Belarus
2020s 36.68 % 30.35 % 6.33 % Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment, Belarus or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 35.4 % against 35.03 % in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment between Belarus and Eswatini?
0.37 %, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Belarus ranks 81st and Eswatini ranks 80th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Eswatini: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/belarus/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/belarus/eswatini/">Belarus vs Eswatini: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,347 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.