Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uganda: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Value

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
66.51 %
in 2023
Uganda
75.82 %
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
5th
Uganda rank
7th

FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Value over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Uganda
020406080200020112023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 75.82 % against 66.51 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 9.31 %.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Uganda ranks 7th of 31 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 73.47 % 67.69 % 5.78 % Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 68.92 % 78.23 % 9.31 % Uganda
2020s 67.22 % 78.19 % 10.97 % Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — value, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Uganda?
Uganda, at 75.82 % against 66.51 % in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — value between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda?
9.31 %, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda rank globally for fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — value?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Uganda ranks 7th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uganda: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-value/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-value/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uganda/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uganda: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 4,476 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.