Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Mali: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value

Democratic Republic of the Congo
55.98 %
in 2023
Mali
74.9 %
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
6th
Mali rank
4th

FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Mali
0255075100200020112023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 74.9 % against 55.98 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 18.92 %.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.3 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mali ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and Mali ranks 4th of 17 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Mali Difference Ahead
2000s 69.71 % 77.61 % 7.91 % Mali
2010s 57.76 % 80.6 % 22.84 % Mali
2020s 57 % 80.08 % 23.08 % Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Mali?
Mali, at 74.9 % against 55.98 % in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mali?
18.92 %, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mali?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mali rank globally for fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 6th and Mali ranks 4th of 17 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Mali: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/mali/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Mali: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.