Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Zambia: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
51.21 %
in 2023
Zambia
64.23 %
in 2023
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
7th
Zambia rank
9th

FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Zambia
020406080200020112023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 64.23 % against 51.21 % in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 13.02 %.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Democratic People's Republic of Korea's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 7th and Zambia ranks 9th of 17 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea Zambia Difference Ahead
2010s 51.2 % 69.18 % 17.98 % Zambia
2020s 51.68 % 66.11 % 14.43 % Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or Zambia?
Zambia, at 64.23 % against 51.21 % in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Zambia?
13.02 %, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Zambia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Zambia rank globally for fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 7th and Zambia ranks 9th of 17 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Zambia: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/zambia/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Zambia: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.