Chagai vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value

Chagai
3.01 %
in 2023
Zimbabwe
58.57 %
in 2023
Chagai rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
15th

FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value over time

  • Chagai
  • Zimbabwe
020406080200020112023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 58.57 % against 3.01 % in Chagai, a difference of 55.56 %.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 19.5 times Chagai's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Chagai ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 17 regions.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chagai Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 4.13 % 61.1 % 56.97 % Zimbabwe
2010s 3.58 % 74.68 % 71.1 % Zimbabwe
2020s 3.09 % 60.99 % 57.9 % Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value, Chagai or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 58.57 % against 3.01 % in Chagai as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value between Chagai and Zimbabwe?
55.56 %, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chagai and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Chagai and Zimbabwe rank globally for fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value?
Chagai ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 17 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chagai vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/channel-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/channel-islands/zimbabwe/">Chagai vs Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.