Chad vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value

Chad
81.43 %
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
62.31 %
in 2023
Chad rank
2nd
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
3rd

FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value over time

  • Chad
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
020406080200020112023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 81.43 % against 62.31 % in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 19.12 %.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.3 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd of 137 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 86.07 % 72.01 % 14.05 % Chad
2010s 82.24 % 67.84 % 14.4 % Chad
2020s 81.58 % 63.8 % 17.78 % Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value, Chad or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Chad, at 81.43 % against 62.31 % in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value between Chad and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
19.12 %, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Chad and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value?
Chad ranks 2nd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/chad/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/chad/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Chad vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.