Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Polynesia: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Female

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
31.43 %
in 2023
Polynesia
13.49 %
in 2023
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
13th
Polynesia rank
16th

FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Female over time

  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • Polynesia
1020304050200020112023

How they compare

Iran (Islamic Republic of) currently reports 31.43 % against 13.49 % in Polynesia, a difference of 17.94 %.

That makes Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s figure about 2.3 times Polynesia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Iran (Islamic Republic of) has been ahead every year.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 13th and Polynesia ranks 16th of 17 countries.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran (Islamic Republic of) Polynesia Difference Ahead
2000s 40.69 % 10.88 % 29.82 % Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2010s 38.5 % 11.99 % 26.51 % Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2020s 34.36 % 16.67 % 17.69 % Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — female, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Polynesia?
Iran (Islamic Republic of), at 31.43 % against 13.49 % in Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — female between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Polynesia?
17.94 %, with Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Polynesia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Polynesia rank globally for fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — female?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 13th and Polynesia ranks 16th of 17 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Polynesia: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Female. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-female-value/iran-islamic-republic-of/polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fao-model-share-of-afs-employment-in-total-employment-female-value/iran-islamic-republic-of/polynesia/">Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Polynesia: FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.