Oman vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added

Oman
6.51 %
in 2012
Saint Kitts and Nevis
5.37 %
in 2012
Oman rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
3rd

Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added over time

  • Oman
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0246200720092012

How they compare

Oman currently reports 6.51 % against 5.37 % in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 1.14 %.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Oman ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 3rd of 96 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 4.7 % 4.89 % 0.1933 % Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 5.47 % 4.94 % 0.53 % Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher expenditure in agricultural r&d as share of agricultural value added, Oman or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Oman, at 6.51 % against 5.37 % in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2012.
What is the difference in expenditure in agricultural r&d as share of agricultural value added between Oman and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
1.14 %, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2012.
How do Oman and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for expenditure in agricultural r&d as share of agricultural value added?
Oman ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 3rd of 96 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-as-share-of-agricultural-value-added-standard-local/oman/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/expenditure-in-agricultural-r-and-d-as-share-of-agricultural-value-added-standard-local/oman/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Oman vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 1,321 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.