Iceland vs United States: Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added
Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added over time
- Iceland
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 2.46 % against 1.97 % in Iceland, a difference of 0.49 %.
That makes United States's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 13th and United States ranks 11th of 96 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and United States in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.45 % | 3.51 % | 0.9417 % | Iceland |
| 2010s | 2.31 % | 3.1 % | 0.785 % | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher expenditure in agricultural r&d as share of agricultural value added, Iceland or United States?
- United States, at 2.46 % against 1.97 % in Iceland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in expenditure in agricultural r&d as share of agricultural value added between Iceland and United States?
- 0.49 %, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and United States?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Iceland and United States rank globally for expenditure in agricultural r&d as share of agricultural value added?
- Iceland ranks 13th and United States ranks 11th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.