Guatemala vs Nigeria: Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added
Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added over time
- Guatemala
- Nigeria
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.13 % against 0.12 % in Nigeria, a difference of 0.01 %.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Nigeria ahead.
Guatemala ranks 87th and Nigeria ranks 88th of 96 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1233 % | 0.4033 % | 0.28 % | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0.135 % | 0.286 % | 0.151 % | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0.12 % | 0.1333 % | 0.0133 % | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher expenditure in agricultural r&d as share of agricultural value added, Guatemala or Nigeria?
- Guatemala, at 0.13 % against 0.12 % in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in expenditure in agricultural r&d as share of agricultural value added between Guatemala and Nigeria?
- 0.01 %, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nigeria?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Nigeria rank globally for expenditure in agricultural r&d as share of agricultural value added?
- Guatemala ranks 87th and Nigeria ranks 88th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Expenditure in Agricultural R&D as Share of Agricultural Value Added (Standard Local Currency) — Government, Higher Education and Private Non-profit. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains a set of financial indicators describing national expenditures on agricultural research and development (R&D). The indicators are derived primarily from responses to the financial resources section of the ASTI questionnaire, complemented with selected external macroeconomic indicators required to ensure comparability across countries and over time.The dataset includes both directly reported financial aggregates and derived indicators, reflecting different dimensions of agricultural R&D investment. Reported expenditure data are collected in current local currency units (LCU) and refer to total institutional expenditures, as provided by national respondents. Coverage of the private for-profit sector remains limited and is therefore excluded from the dataset. To support temporal analysis and international comparability, expenditure indicators are also expressed in constant local currency units, using country-specific GDP deflators sourced from FAOSTAT. In addition, selected indicators relate agricultural R&D expenditures to key structural variables, such as agricultural value added, allowing for meaningful cross-country comparisons of research intensity and resource allocation.