China, mainland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value

China, mainland
115,092 1000 No
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
12,651 1000 No
in 2023
China, mainland rank
2nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value over time

  • China, mainland
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k200020112023

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 115,092 1000 No against 12,651 1000 No in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 102,441 1000 No.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 9.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, China, mainland has been ahead every year.

China, mainland ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 139 countries.

China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 205,342 1000 No 7,230 1000 No 198,112 1000 No China, mainland
2010s 150,071 1000 No 9,397 1000 No 140,674 1000 No China, mainland
2020s 118,518 1000 No 12,037 1000 No 106,481 1000 No China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value, China, mainland or United Republic of Tanzania?
China, mainland, at 115,092 1000 No against 12,651 1000 No in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value between China, mainland and United Republic of Tanzania?
102,441 1000 No, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and United Republic of Tanzania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do China, mainland and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value?
China, mainland ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-total-value-male-all-age-ranges-or/china-mainland/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-total-value-male-all-age-ranges-or/china-mainland/united-republic-of-tanzania/">China, mainland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,402 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.