Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Equatorial Guinea: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value

Bosnia and Herzegovina
206.45 1000 No
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
214.68 1000 No
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
95th
Equatorial Guinea rank
94th

Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Equatorial Guinea
100150200250300350200020112023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 214.68 1000 No against 206.45 1000 No in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 8.23 1000 No.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 95th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th of 139 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 292.21 1000 No 103.8 1000 No 188.41 1000 No Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 235.32 1000 No 163.92 1000 No 71.4 1000 No Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 205.84 1000 No 199.55 1000 No 6.29 1000 No Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 214.68 1000 No against 206.45 1000 No in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea?
8.23 1000 No, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 95th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th of 139 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Equatorial Guinea: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-total-value-male-all-age-ranges-or/bosnia-and-herzegovina/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-total-value-male-all-age-ranges-or/bosnia-and-herzegovina/equatorial-guinea/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Equatorial Guinea: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,402 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.