Southern Asia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value

Southern Asia
150,089 1000 No
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
12,984 1000 No
in 2023
Southern Asia rank
5th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value over time

  • Southern Asia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
050.0k100.0k150.0k200020112023

How they compare

Southern Asia currently reports 150,089 1000 No against 12,984 1000 No in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 137,105 1000 No.

That makes Southern Asia's figure about 11.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Southern Asia has been ahead every year.

Southern Asia ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 30 groups.

Southern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Southern Asia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 111,083 1000 No 7,597 1000 No 103,486 1000 No Southern Asia
2010s 107,309 1000 No 9,636 1000 No 97,673 1000 No Southern Asia
2020s 133,800 1000 No 12,381 1000 No 121,418 1000 No Southern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value, Southern Asia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Southern Asia, at 150,089 1000 No against 12,984 1000 No in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value between Southern Asia and United Republic of Tanzania?
137,105 1000 No, with Southern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Asia and United Republic of Tanzania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Southern Asia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value?
Southern Asia ranks 5th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Southern Asia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-total-value-female-all-age-ranges/southern-asia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-total-value-female-all-age-ranges/southern-asia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Southern Asia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,402 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.