Puerto Rico vs Tonga: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value
Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value over time
- Puerto Rico
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 14.32 1000 No against 13.64 1000 No in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.68 1000 No.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 131st and Tonga ranks 130th of 145 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.57 1000 No | 11.04 1000 No | 12.54 1000 No | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 14.07 1000 No | 13.67 1000 No | 0.402 1000 No | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 13.72 1000 No | 16.21 1000 No | 2.49 1000 No | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value, Puerto Rico or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 14.32 1000 No against 13.64 1000 No in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value between Puerto Rico and Tonga?
- 0.68 1000 No, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Tonga?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Puerto Rico and Tonga rank globally for employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value?
- Puerto Rico ranks 131st and Tonga ranks 130th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.