Cook Islands vs Guam: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value
Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value over time
- Cook Islands
- Guam
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 1.27 1000 No against 1.21 1000 No in Guam, a difference of 0.06 1000 No.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Guam ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 140th and Guam ranks 141st of 145 countries.
Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Guam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.17 1000 No | 1.35 1000 No | 0.185 1000 No | Guam |
| 2020s | 1.2 1000 No | 1.21 1000 No | 0.0175 1000 No | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value, Cook Islands or Guam?
- Cook Islands, at 1.27 1000 No against 1.21 1000 No in Guam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value between Cook Islands and Guam?
- 0.06 1000 No, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Guam?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Guam rank globally for employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: total — value?
- Cook Islands ranks 140th and Guam ranks 141st of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Total — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.