Denmark vs Jordan: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm

Denmark
209.37 1000 No
in 2023
Jordan
205.87 1000 No
in 2023
Denmark rank
84th
Jordan rank
86th

Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm over time

  • Denmark
  • Jordan
50100150200250200020112023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 209.37 1000 No against 205.87 1000 No in Jordan, a difference of 3.5 1000 No.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 84th and Jordan ranks 86th of 136 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 231.89 1000 No 86.86 1000 No 145.04 1000 No Denmark
2010s 200.9 1000 No 148.03 1000 No 52.87 1000 No Denmark
2020s 208.08 1000 No 191.55 1000 No 16.53 1000 No Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: off-farm, Denmark or Jordan?
Denmark, at 209.37 1000 No against 205.87 1000 No in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: off-farm between Denmark and Jordan?
3.5 1000 No, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Jordan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Jordan rank globally for employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: off-farm?
Denmark ranks 84th and Jordan ranks 86th of 136 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm agrifood systems — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Jordan: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-off-farm-agrifood-systems-value-all/denmark/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-off-farm-agrifood-systems-value-all/denmark/jordan/">Denmark vs Jordan: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm agrifood systems — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 4,069 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.