Australia and New Zealand vs Mali: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm

Australia and New Zealand
1,866 1000 No
in 2023
Mali
1,559 1000 No
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
32nd
Mali rank
35th

Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Mali
5001.0k1.5k2.0k200020112023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 1,866 1000 No against 1,559 1000 No in Mali, a difference of 307 1000 No.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 32nd and Mali ranks 35th of 136 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Mali Difference Ahead
2000s 1,685 1000 No 622.71 1000 No 1,063 1000 No Australia and New Zealand
2010s 1,785 1000 No 1,136 1000 No 649.13 1000 No Australia and New Zealand
2020s 1,844 1000 No 1,469 1000 No 375.74 1000 No Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: off-farm, Australia and New Zealand or Mali?
Australia and New Zealand, at 1,866 1000 No against 1,559 1000 No in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: off-farm between Australia and New Zealand and Mali?
307 1000 No, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Mali?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Mali rank globally for employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: off-farm?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 32nd and Mali ranks 35th of 136 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm agrifood systems — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Mali: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-off-farm-agrifood-systems-value-all/australia-and-new-zealand/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-off-farm-agrifood-systems-value-all/australia-and-new-zealand/mali/">Australia and New Zealand vs Mali: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm agrifood systems — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 4,069 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.