Malta vs Tonga: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm
Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm over time
- Malta
- Tonga
How they compare
Malta currently reports 5.12 1000 No against 4.97 1000 No in Tonga, a difference of 0.15 1000 No.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Tonga ahead.
Malta ranks 119th and Tonga ranks 120th of 126 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.04 1000 No | 4.12 1000 No | 0.9275 1000 No | Malta |
| 2020s | 4.98 1000 No | 5.75 1000 No | 0.7625 1000 No | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: off-farm, Malta or Tonga?
- Malta, at 5.12 1000 No against 4.97 1000 No in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: off-farm between Malta and Tonga?
- 0.15 1000 No, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tonga?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Tonga rank globally for employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: off-farm?
- Malta ranks 119th and Tonga ranks 120th of 126 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Off-farm agrifood systems — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.