Australia and New Zealand vs Kyrgyzstan: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Agriculture

Australia and New Zealand
464.03 1000 No
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan
438.74 1000 No
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
67th
Kyrgyzstan rank
69th

Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Agriculture over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Kyrgyzstan
02004006008001.0k200020112023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 464.03 1000 No against 438.74 1000 No in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 25.29 1000 No.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 67th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 69th of 145 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
2000s 576.27 1000 No 677.98 1000 No 101.7 1000 No Kyrgyzstan
2010s 489.75 1000 No 506.41 1000 No 16.66 1000 No Kyrgyzstan
2020s 489.89 1000 No 435.59 1000 No 54.3 1000 No Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: agriculture, Australia and New Zealand or Kyrgyzstan?
Australia and New Zealand, at 464.03 1000 No against 438.74 1000 No in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: agriculture between Australia and New Zealand and Kyrgyzstan?
25.29 1000 No, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Kyrgyzstan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: agriculture?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 67th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 69th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Agriculture — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Kyrgyzstan: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Agriculture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-agriculture-value-all-age-ranges-or/australia-and-new-zealand/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/employment-in-agrifood-systems-by-subindustry-and-sex-agriculture-value-all-age-ranges-or/australia-and-new-zealand/kyrgyz-republic/">Australia and New Zealand vs Kyrgyzstan: Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Agriculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Employment in agrifood systems by subindustry and sex: Agriculture — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agriculture
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
191 places, 4,429 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.