Serbia vs Southern Africa: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.
Serbia
108.43
in 2024
Southern Africa
105.98
in 2024
Serbia rank
12th
Southern Africa rank
11th
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time
- Serbia
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 108.43 against 105.98 in Southern Africa, a difference of 2.45.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Southern Africa ahead.
Serbia ranks 12th and Southern Africa ranks 11th of 63 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 104.14 | 102.49 | 1.65 | Serbia |
| 2020s | 108.12 | 105.88 | 2.24 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Serbia or Southern Africa?
- Serbia, at 108.43 against 105.98 in Southern Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Serbia and Southern Africa?
- 2.45, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Southern Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Southern Africa rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Serbia ranks 12th and Southern Africa ranks 11th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.