Sao Tome and Principe vs Suriname: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Sao Tome and Principe
101.75
in 2024
Suriname
103.05
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
36th
Suriname rank
33rd

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Suriname
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 103.05 against 101.75 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.3.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 36th and Suriname ranks 33rd of 63 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 6 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 3,919 6.91 3,912 Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 7,236 17.02 7,219 Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 2,664 32.63 2,631 Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 1,558 21.24 1,537 Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 1,520 28.9 1,491 Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 111.9 81.4 30.49 Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 102.15 102.92 0.772 Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Sao Tome and Principe or Suriname?
Suriname, at 103.05 against 101.75 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Sao Tome and Principe and Suriname?
1.3, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Suriname?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Suriname rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 36th and Suriname ranks 33rd of 63 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Suriname: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production/sao-tome-and-principe/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-production/sao-tome-and-principe/suriname/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Suriname: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 5,482 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.