Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Thailand: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
80.82
in 2024
Thailand
101.93
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
18th
Thailand rank
17th

Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Thailand
0100200300400196119922024

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 101.93 against 80.82 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 21.11.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.3 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th and Thailand ranks 17th of 23 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 6 and Thailand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 166.48 24.88 141.6 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 214.74 31.53 183.21 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 350.9 30.13 320.77 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 168.86 36.08 132.78 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 95.51 70.01 25.5 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 99.03 97.06 1.97 Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 85.15 102.4 17.25 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Thailand?
Thailand, at 101.93 against 80.82 in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Thailand?
21.11, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Thailand?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Thailand rank globally for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th and Thailand ranks 17th of 23 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Thailand: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-per-capita/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-roots-and-tubers-with-high-starch-or-inulin-content-n-e-c-fresh-gross-per-capita/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/thailand/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Thailand: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Gross per capita Production Index Number (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
98 places, 5,482 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 2014-2016. Indices for meat production are computed based on data on production from indigenous animals.