Malaysia vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Malaysia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malaysia rank
147th
Papua New Guinea rank
146th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Malaysia
  • Papua New Guinea
0000196119922024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Malaysia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 147th and Papua New Guinea ranks 146th of 159 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Malaysia
1970s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Malaysia
1980s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Malaysia or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Malaysia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Malaysia and Papua New Guinea?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Papua New Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Malaysia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Malaysia ranks 147th and Papua New Guinea ranks 146th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/malaysia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/malaysia/papua-new-guinea/">Malaysia vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,504 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.