Belgium vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Belgium
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Papua New Guinea
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Belgium rank
143rd
Papua New Guinea rank
146th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Belgium
  • Papua New Guinea
000000196119922024

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.6 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Belgium ranks 143rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 146th of 159 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Belgium or Papua New Guinea?
Belgium, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Papua New Guinea as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Belgium and Papua New Guinea?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Papua New Guinea?
18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do Belgium and Papua New Guinea rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Belgium ranks 143rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 146th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/papua-new-guinea/">Belgium vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,504 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.