Australia vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Australia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Romania
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Australia rank
42nd
Romania rank
39th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Australia
  • Romania
00000196119922024

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Australia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Romania ahead.

Australia ranks 42nd and Romania ranks 39th of 159 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Romania Difference Ahead
1980s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Romania
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Romania
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Romania
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Australia or Romania?
Romania, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Australia as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Australia and Romania?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Romania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2017.
How do Australia and Romania rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Australia ranks 42nd and Romania ranks 39th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/romania/">Australia vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,504 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.