How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zambia?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Argentina vs Zambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Argentina

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Zambia

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Argentina rank

90th

Zambia rank

93rd

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

Argentina
Zambia

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Zambia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 93rd of 159 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Argentina	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Argentina
1970s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Argentina
1980s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Argentina
1990s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Argentina
2000s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Argentina
2010s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Argentina
2020s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Argentina or Zambia?: Argentina, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Argentina and Zambia?: 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zambia?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Zambia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?: Argentina ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 93rd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Zambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-unit-of-gdp/argentina/zambia/">Argentina vs Zambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP
Unit: t per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 160 places, 8,504 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.