Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Sweden
0.0013 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Zimbabwe
0.0016 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden rank
122nd
Zimbabwe rank
120th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Sweden
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0016 t per square kilometre against 0.0013 t per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0003 t per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sweden ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 160 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.0012 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0012 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Sweden or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0016 t per square kilometre against 0.0013 t per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
0.0003 t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Sweden ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/">Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.