South Africa vs Turkmenistan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

South Africa
0.0436 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0362 t per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
30th
Turkmenistan rank
33rd

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • South Africa
  • Turkmenistan
0.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.0436 t per square kilometre against 0.0362 t per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.0074 t per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Turkmenistan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 30th and Turkmenistan ranks 33rd of 160 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.034 t per square kilometre 0.0136 t per square kilometre 0.0204 t per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0.0383 t per square kilometre 0.0275 t per square kilometre 0.0107 t per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 0.0469 t per square kilometre 0.0348 t per square kilometre 0.0121 t per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 0.0451 t per square kilometre 0.0366 t per square kilometre 0.0085 t per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, South Africa or Turkmenistan?
South Africa, at 0.0436 t per square kilometre against 0.0362 t per square kilometre in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between South Africa and Turkmenistan?
0.0074 t per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Turkmenistan rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
South Africa ranks 30th and Turkmenistan ranks 33rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Turkmenistan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/turkmenistan/">South Africa vs Turkmenistan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.