Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Rwanda
0.0197 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0.0201 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
50th
Saudi Arabia rank
49th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Rwanda
  • Saudi Arabia
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.0201 t per square kilometre against 0.0197 t per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0004 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 50th and Saudi Arabia ranks 49th of 160 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0043 t per square kilometre 0.0016 t per square kilometre 0.0027 t per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0.0055 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre 0.0036 t per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.0069 t per square kilometre 0.0049 t per square kilometre 0.002 t per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.0066 t per square kilometre 0.006 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.0095 t per square kilometre 0.007 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.0433 t per square kilometre 0.009 t per square kilometre 0.0343 t per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.0237 t per square kilometre 0.0161 t per square kilometre 0.0075 t per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Rwanda or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.0201 t per square kilometre against 0.0197 t per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
0.0004 t per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Saudi Arabia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Rwanda ranks 50th and Saudi Arabia ranks 49th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/saudi-arabia/">Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.