Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Puerto Rico
0.0016 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0016 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
118th
Zimbabwe rank
120th
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Puerto Rico
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0.0016 t per square kilometre against 0.0016 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 160 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | Puerto Rico |
| 1980s | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | Puerto Rico |
| 1990s | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 0.001 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 0.0015 t per square kilometre | 0.0013 t per square kilometre | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Puerto Rico or Zimbabwe?
- Puerto Rico, at 0.0016 t per square kilometre against 0.0016 t per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
- 0 t per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Puerto Rico ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.