Paraguay vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Paraguay
0.0009 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0009 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay rank
125th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
126th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Paraguay
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 0.0009 t per square kilometre against 0.0009 t per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Paraguay ranks 125th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 126th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Paraguay
1990s 0.0011 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0011 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Paraguay
2020s 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Paraguay or Sao Tome and Principe?
Paraguay, at 0.0009 t per square kilometre against 0.0009 t per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Paraguay and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 t per square kilometre, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Paraguay and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Paraguay ranks 125th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 126th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paraguay vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/paraguay/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/paraguay/sao-tome-and-principe/">Paraguay vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.