Nicaragua vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Nicaragua
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
158th
Suriname rank
159th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Suriname
00000196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 2.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 158th and Suriname ranks 159th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Nicaragua or Suriname?
Nicaragua, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Nicaragua and Suriname?
0 t per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Nicaragua ranks 158th and Suriname ranks 159th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/suriname/">Nicaragua vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.