Nicaragua vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Nicaragua
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
158th
Papua New Guinea rank
160th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Papua New Guinea
000000196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 3.4 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.

Nicaragua ranks 158th and Papua New Guinea ranks 160th of 160 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Nicaragua or Papua New Guinea?
Nicaragua, at 0 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea?
0 t per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Nicaragua ranks 158th and Papua New Guinea ranks 160th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/papua-new-guinea/">Nicaragua vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.