New Caledonia vs Philippines: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

New Caledonia
0.0001 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
0.0001 t per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
153rd
Philippines rank
155th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Philippines
0000196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0001 t per square kilometre against 0.0001 t per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 153rd and Philippines ranks 155th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 6 and Philippines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, New Caledonia or Philippines?
New Caledonia, at 0.0001 t per square kilometre against 0.0001 t per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between New Caledonia and Philippines?
0 t per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Philippines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Philippines rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
New Caledonia ranks 153rd and Philippines ranks 155th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Philippines: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/philippines/">New Caledonia vs Philippines: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.