Mauritius vs Norway: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Mauritius
0.0028 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.0034 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
106th
Norway rank
103rd

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Norway
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.0034 t per square kilometre against 0.0028 t per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0006 t per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 106th and Norway ranks 103rd of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0053 t per square kilometre 0.0034 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0041 t per square kilometre 0.0038 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.003 t per square kilometre 0.0036 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.0032 t per square kilometre 0.0036 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.0035 t per square kilometre 0.0037 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0038 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.0026 t per square kilometre 0.0036 t per square kilometre 0.001 t per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Mauritius or Norway?
Norway, at 0.0034 t per square kilometre against 0.0028 t per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Mauritius and Norway?
0.0006 t per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Norway rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Mauritius ranks 106th and Norway ranks 103rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Norway: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/norway/">Mauritius vs Norway: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.