Malta vs South Africa: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Malta
0.0458 t per square kilometre
in 2017
South Africa
0.0436 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
29th
South Africa rank
30th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Malta
  • South Africa
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0458 t per square kilometre against 0.0436 t per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.0022 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 30th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0812 t per square kilometre 0.0355 t per square kilometre 0.0457 t per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0.0451 t per square kilometre 0.0395 t per square kilometre 0.0056 t per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.0098 t per square kilometre 0.0373 t per square kilometre 0.0275 t per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0.0168 t per square kilometre 0.0363 t per square kilometre 0.0194 t per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0.04 t per square kilometre 0.0383 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0429 t per square kilometre 0.047 t per square kilometre 0.004 t per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Malta or South Africa?
Malta, at 0.0458 t per square kilometre against 0.0436 t per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Malta and South Africa?
0.0022 t per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and South Africa?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Malta and South Africa rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Malta ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 30th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs South Africa: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/malta/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/malta/south-africa/">Malta vs South Africa: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.