Mali vs Sweden: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Mali
0.0012 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0013 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Mali rank
123rd
Sweden rank
122nd
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Mali
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.0013 t per square kilometre against 0.0012 t per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 123rd and Sweden ranks 122nd of 160 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0024 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.0019 t per square kilometre | Mali |
| 1970s | 0.003 t per square kilometre | 0.001 t per square kilometre | 0.002 t per square kilometre | Mali |
| 1980s | 0.0033 t per square kilometre | 0.0012 t per square kilometre | 0.0021 t per square kilometre | Mali |
| 1990s | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.001 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.001 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | 0.0012 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Mali or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.0013 t per square kilometre against 0.0012 t per square kilometre in Mali as of 2017.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Mali and Sweden?
- 0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sweden?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
- How do Mali and Sweden rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Mali ranks 123rd and Sweden ranks 122nd of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.