Luxembourg vs Sweden: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Luxembourg
0.0011 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Sweden
0.0013 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Luxembourg rank
124th
Sweden rank
122nd

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Sweden
0.0010.0010.002196119892017

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0013 t per square kilometre against 0.0011 t per square kilometre in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.0002 t per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sweden ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 124th and Sweden ranks 122nd of 160 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0012 t per square kilometre 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Luxembourg
2010s 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Luxembourg or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0013 t per square kilometre against 0.0011 t per square kilometre in Luxembourg as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Luxembourg and Sweden?
0.0002 t per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sweden?
18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do Luxembourg and Sweden rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Luxembourg ranks 124th and Sweden ranks 122nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Sweden: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/luxembourg/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/luxembourg/sweden/">Luxembourg vs Sweden: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.