Lithuania vs Namibia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Lithuania
0.0024 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Namibia
0.0024 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
110th
Namibia rank
113th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Lithuania
  • Namibia
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.0024 t per square kilometre against 0.0024 t per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 110th and Namibia ranks 113th of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Lithuania or Namibia?
Lithuania, at 0.0024 t per square kilometre against 0.0024 t per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Lithuania and Namibia?
0 t per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Lithuania and Namibia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Lithuania ranks 110th and Namibia ranks 113th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Namibia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/namibia/">Lithuania vs Namibia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.