Kyrgyzstan vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Kyrgyzstan
0.0862 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.0742 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Romania rank
18th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Romania
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.0862 t per square kilometre against 0.0742 t per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.012 t per square kilometre.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Romania ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th and Romania ranks 18th of 160 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0635 t per square kilometre 0.0701 t per square kilometre 0.0067 t per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0432 t per square kilometre 0.0535 t per square kilometre 0.0103 t per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.058 t per square kilometre 0.0696 t per square kilometre 0.0116 t per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Kyrgyzstan or Romania?
Kyrgyzstan, at 0.0862 t per square kilometre against 0.0742 t per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
0.012 t per square kilometre, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Romania rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th and Romania ranks 18th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/romania/">Kyrgyzstan vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.