Kazakhstan vs Mexico: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Kazakhstan
0.0063 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.0061 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
85th
Mexico rank
86th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Mexico
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0063 t per square kilometre against 0.0061 t per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.0002 t per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 85th and Mexico ranks 86th of 160 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Mexico Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0084 t per square kilometre 0.0026 t per square kilometre 0.0057 t per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.0045 t per square kilometre 0.0039 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 0.0064 t per square kilometre 0.0053 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0.0062 t per square kilometre 0.0059 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Kazakhstan or Mexico?
Kazakhstan, at 0.0063 t per square kilometre against 0.0061 t per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Kazakhstan and Mexico?
0.0002 t per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mexico?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Mexico rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Kazakhstan ranks 85th and Mexico ranks 86th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Mexico: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/mexico/">Kazakhstan vs Mexico: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.