Guinea vs Peru: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Guinea
0.011 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0111 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea rank
72nd
Peru rank
71st

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Guinea
  • Peru
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0111 t per square kilometre against 0.011 t per square kilometre in Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 72nd and Peru ranks 71st of 160 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0044 t per square kilometre 0.0037 t per square kilometre Peru
1970s 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.0043 t per square kilometre 0.0035 t per square kilometre Peru
1980s 0.0011 t per square kilometre 0.0059 t per square kilometre 0.0048 t per square kilometre Peru
1990s 0.0019 t per square kilometre 0.007 t per square kilometre 0.0051 t per square kilometre Peru
2000s 0.0037 t per square kilometre 0.0108 t per square kilometre 0.0071 t per square kilometre Peru
2010s 0.0066 t per square kilometre 0.0112 t per square kilometre 0.0047 t per square kilometre Peru
2020s 0.0098 t per square kilometre 0.011 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Guinea or Peru?
Peru, at 0.0111 t per square kilometre against 0.011 t per square kilometre in Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Guinea and Peru?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Peru rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Guinea ranks 72nd and Peru ranks 71st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Peru: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/guinea/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/guinea/peru/">Guinea vs Peru: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.