French Polynesia vs Sri Lanka: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

French Polynesia
0.0002 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.0002 t per square kilometre
in 1990
French Polynesia rank
147th
Sri Lanka rank
145th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Sri Lanka
00.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0002 t per square kilometre against 0.0002 t per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 147th and Sri Lanka ranks 145th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0014 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
1970s 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
1980s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, French Polynesia or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.0002 t per square kilometre against 0.0002 t per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 1990.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between French Polynesia and Sri Lanka?
0 t per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Sri Lanka?
30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do French Polynesia and Sri Lanka rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
French Polynesia ranks 147th and Sri Lanka ranks 145th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Sri Lanka: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/sri-lanka/">French Polynesia vs Sri Lanka: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.