French Polynesia vs Mozambique: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

French Polynesia
0.0002 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.0001 t per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
147th
Mozambique rank
148th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Mozambique
00.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.0002 t per square kilometre against 0.0001 t per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.2 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 147th and Mozambique ranks 148th of 160 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0014 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0013 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
1970s 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0008 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
1980s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, French Polynesia or Mozambique?
French Polynesia, at 0.0002 t per square kilometre against 0.0001 t per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between French Polynesia and Mozambique?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Mozambique rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
French Polynesia ranks 147th and Mozambique ranks 148th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Mozambique: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/mozambique/">French Polynesia vs Mozambique: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.