France vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

France
0.0161 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0137 t per square kilometre
in 2023
France rank
58th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
61st

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • France
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

France currently reports 0.0161 t per square kilometre against 0.0137 t per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0024 t per square kilometre.

That makes France's figure about 1.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

France ranks 58th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 61st of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0161 t per square kilometre 0.0414 t per square kilometre 0.0252 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0213 t per square kilometre 0.0418 t per square kilometre 0.0205 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0279 t per square kilometre 0.0571 t per square kilometre 0.0292 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0251 t per square kilometre 0.0473 t per square kilometre 0.0223 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0222 t per square kilometre 0.0226 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0176 t per square kilometre 0.008 t per square kilometre 0.0096 t per square kilometre France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, France or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
France, at 0.0161 t per square kilometre against 0.0137 t per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between France and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0024 t per square kilometre, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do France and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
France ranks 58th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 61st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/france/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/france/st-kitts-and-nevis/">France vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.