Finland vs Malaysia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Finland
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Malaysia
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
140th
Malaysia rank
143rd

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Finland
  • Malaysia
0000.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 140th and Malaysia ranks 143rd of 160 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Finland or Malaysia?
Finland, at 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Finland and Malaysia?
0 t per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Malaysia?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Finland and Malaysia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Finland ranks 140th and Malaysia ranks 143rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Malaysia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/finland/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/finland/malaysia/">Finland vs Malaysia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.